cm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agoWebplemmy.mlimagemessage-square169linkfedilinkarrow-up1593arrow-down1124 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1469arrow-down1imageWebplemmy.mlcm0002@piefed.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square169linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up51arrow-down1·16 hours agoQuality loss? Webp supports lossless.
minus-squarepalordrolap@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up13·13 hours agoSo does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
minus-squareMower2560@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoActually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
minus-squarefilcuk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoPractically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.
Quality loss? Webp supports lossless.
So does JPEG. It doesn’t mean that people (will) use it for that.
Actually? I didnt know that. Is it used often? Any downsides ?
Practically never because it’s rubbish. The only possible use is on old precision machines that don’t support newer standards, like medical imaging.