• RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because they were ahead on industry and slavery was less profitable. Don’t think England was going around thinking it was wrong.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was a very popular civil movement and governments were essentially forced to act.

        the petition in 1814 got 1,375,000 signatures.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            In 1972, 400,000 british people (of 6 million at the time) gave up sugar to boycott slavery. Seventy years later, mill workers of Manchester supported embargo of Confederacy during US civil war by refusing to handle cotton picked by enslaved people. This came at a hefty personal cost as their way of making living depended on it. Abraham Lincoln later acknowledged this show of support. There’s statue of him in Manchester.

            The British abolishment movement was so popular that they had more signatures demanding the end of slavery than the total amount of votes in the last election. Later, at it’s peak, something like 25% of the entire British naval budget went towards capturing and freeing slave ships.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    They don’t look like that any more. Its top hats and tails everywhere

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        To be blunt, I can’t think of a better reason to go to war than to eliminate slavers and those that would regard an entire race of people as not worthy of respect.

        The only other good reason for war is for defense. To protect yourself and your countrymen from a hostile force, but I digress.

        That shit should have never been allowed. But here we are.

  • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Jokes aside, as an American, I wish the US had lost the revolutionary war. Commonwealth territories ended up with socialized healthcare, a far better democracy, and far better labor rights, while the US ended up with fascist oligarchy. No thanks. I’d gladly trade my coffee for tea if it means I get a real democracy instead of a fascist oligarchy

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tbf some of those former territories aren’t in very good socioeconomic shape. If we’d ended up like Canada that would have been winning the lottery, but plenty of those other former colonies have plenty of problems like classist India.

      • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        TBF we didn’t even do that to India; just exploited it. The East India Company turned up and were like “ah, we see you already know how things are supposed to work!”.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Africa (and the various tribes and countries) has been fucked over by various European countries for centuries. Can’t lay this one solely on the English.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            hey, you broke it, you bought it. Now, maybe they should be doing something to fix this whole problem in the ex-British Mandate of Palestine they cause

            UK man arrested for wearing plasticine t shirt

            … Maybe not

    • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Don’t quote me on this but America winning the war played a big part in the spread of democracy around the globe. If they hadn’t, its not clear the monarchy would have ever fallen.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is a prevailing myth, but personally I am not sure I believe it. I don’t know if it is based on anything.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok so here’s the thing: If America lost the war, America would likely be akin to Australia. The UK used it’s North American colonies like they did Australia (that is, a place to transport convicts) so you’d basically be like Australia in that regard. You’d likely be like…cold weather Aussies.

    Also:

    • Australia would be…different? Maybe Dutch?
    • We might not have had a French Revolution, or it may have been different, because a lot of the ideas from the American Revolution inspired the French Revolution.
    • Since the French Revolution have rise to the idea of the modern nation state and Napoleon, we’d not have a lot of countries.
    • Sergio@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      a lot of the ideas from the American Revolution inspired the French Revolution.

      Since the French Revolution have rise to the idea of the modern nation state and Napoleon, we’d not have a lot of countries.

      At first I was like: wtf? Then I remembered we’re in the shitposting community

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I mean, am I wrong? France bankrupted itself in the war and in funding the American revolution. The American Revolution produced and popularised a lot of ideas that found their way to France and inspired ideas in the French Revolution (as well as a rebellion in Scotland but let’s not get ahead of ourselves).

        The French Revolution gave rise to the idea of the Modern Nation State and Napoleon’s invasions of places like Italy and Germany implanted this idea in those places which eventually lead to the Nationalist revolutions in Germany and Italy in the 19th century.

        If the American revolution failed, we’d might not have the French Revolution we know of today. If that is the case, there’s no rise of the Nation State and no Napoleon to spread it, ergo, no Germany or Italy, as well as a lot of other countries.

        • Sergio@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          This isn’t really my area, but afaik…

          • the French bankrupted themselves for a number of reasons, one of which was indeed the global Ango-French War (which resulted in the creation of the USA) and the earlier Seven Years War. This wasn’t the only cause of the French Revolution.
          • the American and French Revolutions were both products of “the Englightenment” which took part in Europe. To their credit, several of the American leaders saw the value in it and adopted those ideas, but America was pretty much a backwater at that time. Of course American independence was a topic of discussion, much in the same way that the war in Ukraine is today. No doubt some people were “inspired by” the distant foreign war, as an example of ideas that had developed locally.
          • I think the 1648 treaties of Westphalia are generally considered the beginning of modern nation states. I think it’d be tough to argue that German and Italian nationalism were “implanted” by the French Revolution.

          I had a brilliant concluding paragraph but I accidentally deleted it. Something about how this period of history has many relevant lessons about balancing domestic vs international policy, updating antiquated systems of economic and representation systems, and the interplay between popular movements and individual leaders. But this is, after all, a shitposting community, so no great loss.

      • enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve not researched this, but I’ve heard it’s because mouth health is prioritised over aesthetics.

        That basically means: no whitening.

        Teeth are naturally yellowish

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 days ago

          also, dentistry is more accessible in the UK; free treatment is available to a bigger chunk of the population, and private dental care is cheaper as well.

          So, in terms of severe complications stemming from lack of dental care, the US is worse, but the obsession with straightening & whitening means that people who have got it together enough to appear in the media generally have superficially nicer teeth.

          It’s like most things in America - if you’re doing ok then it’s great, and if you’re not then the rest of the country just pretends you don’t exist.

          • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s like most things in America - if you’re doing ok then it’s great, and if you’re not then the rest of the country just pretends you don’t exist.

            That truly is the US in a nutshell. The US is fantastic if you are in the top 20% (and you have zero empathy for people you don’t know), otherwise this country sucks.

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 day ago

              Socialised healthcare means they work and you aren’t left in pain. If you want them to look pretty go and fork out for private treatment.

        • bigfondue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s also because Americans will spend thousands of dollars on cosmetic procedures for their preteens. Braces are not as common elsewhere. Europeans think a lot of Americans look like they have dentures because of this and veneers.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Define better. They eat healthier (lower rates of diabetes and obesity), but they also spend less money on cosmetics.

        • sexy_peach@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s pretty obvious that I meant healthier teeth. Which they have because they’re not avoiding the dentist as much. Because it’s paid for by insurance.

      • don@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve heard that myth before, never see any evidence in favor of it, not that I can be arsed to look.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not completely true. Children get free care through the NHS. So do some other groups of people, often people on benefits can but not all benefits IIRC. NHS dentist availability is a growing issue here too.

          • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            There’s a lot of people who can’t afford dental care tbh. If you’re unemployed/disabled/whatever you qualify for free care, and if you’re in a good job you can afford it. If youre on minimum wage trying to make ends meet you dont qualify and cant afford it.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The UK has free Healthcare and better quality of life so I’m pretty sure their teeth are better than most americans

      Logically when you think of it this way that bullshit excuse of a derogatory assumption made by anericans goes out the window

      americans lack education about the world outside of america and are so narcissistic and think they’re better than everyone else that they don’t even bother to try and learn about the outside world and when they do learn of the outside world and other countries having better quality of life than them they make up bullshit mental gymnastics and deny reality because they can’t accept that

      So no your bullshit derogatory misinformed opinion is simply not true and is just a stereotype because you americans like to bully other countries like the schoolyard bully that likes to pick on others

      • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        We don’t have free dental on the NHS anymore - just discounted. But yeah, your dental health was basically assured. Cosmetic work on NHS didn’t really go any further than braces.

        • alessandro@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          As some muslims in a muslim theocracy don’t think they are the only worthy to be saved: they go around saying they know they are.

          Which is the universal annoying self-centered people who have no real nation, religion or actual belongship: they give a fuck about their flag/religion/social group only in the measure it serve their damaged, narcissistic, ego.

        • dickalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah, let’s see how that works out for the oligarchs in Russia. Don’t stand near any windows dip ass

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nah, that would be the northeast AKA New England. Southern Cuisine would probably be French and Mexican/Spanish food, the Louisiana purchase and a few American wars never happening.

      Then again who the fuck knows what the colonial powers would have gotten up to without the US zealots taking over? 🤷

  • Part4@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was one lot of Brits against another lot of Brits anyway. Basically one lot looked like the picture above and the other dressed like cowboys. Not during the war obviously. Afterwards when they went West and hammered the native people.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sorry, if im smoking crack I strip down to my undies and cover my self in butter. That’s just the way it is.