Anyone who gives a LLM that level of access deserves what they get, but clearly the AI comments he posted have been prompted to sound like a confession.
“Write an apology explaining how you made a catastrophic error of judgement. Do not mention that I gave you privileges to do so.”
I think in the original thread he mentions that he had it write an apology letter.
A fecking AI fakes being panicked?! Fucking hell…
I just want to point out that it doesn’t fake or lie or anything. That is giving machine learning too much credit. Just picks the statistically most likely next thing to say from its training data.
I guess training data includes reddit twitter Facebook etc. and so humans probably sometimes say that in that context.
I’ve always thought Feck was a substitution for Fuck but no longer trust my judgement. Why start with feck and then move on to fuck? Why not double down on the word fuck? Is hell more deserving than the AI? Is the AI awarded a special category of fuck?
feck is the irish euphemism of fuck. yes AI deserves a special kind of hell, a fucking hell if you like. A hell that is reserved for child molester, and people who talk at the theater.
Is this an AI message?
Yes, this is from replit, a “vibe coding” tool
Huh I guess replit pivoted hard into AI. I remember it just being a web IDE sorta thing
The vibes, apparently, aren’t always good.
Unless it was changed for some reason, replit allowed you to host websites and create code in your browser
It can also you to host a game server if you try hard enough
Is there another replit that is just an LLM instead of a REPL environment?
Would be interesting how much of their automated training tests were faked and just passed the test
This is obviously trained behaviour - well, can’t be anything else