• hypna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even a socialist command economy has to reason in terms of inputs and outputs. The difference in value between the two is a pretty good indicator of whether the given economic activity is successful or not. In a capitalist system the positive difference is called profits and the capitalists get to keep it. That fact doesn’t discredit the entire concept of “profits” as a net gain in value.

    Anyway, just because the capitalists may win most (the whole system is called capitalism after all), doesn’t mean that ramping up European arms production isn’t a huge benefit for Ukraine.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I said nothing about socialist command economy 🙄

      Try reading up about “capitalist realism” and you might realize that there are a lot of other options than capitalism or socialist dictatorship. Anyone who argues in binaries like that is either extremely naive or has a capitalist agenda.

      And no. The benefit to Ukraine is indirect at best. Notice how the pundits like to always say “but Ukraine” and how there is a suspicious absense of concrete plans on how this increased defense spending is directly benefitting Ukraine?