• NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Because that might invoke feelings of empathy & compassion for the human beings risking their lives travelling across the channel.

    Or raise awareness to the criminal exploitation migrants suffer to just get a position on the boats. Or the continued exploitation they endure whilst living in the UK. Just ignore what possible reason someone would uproot their lives and travel thousands of miles illegally, I’m sure it was something small & trivial…

    No no no… all our world’s problems are solely caused by migrants! Certainly not the billionaires exploiting everyone pushing the narrative.

    • rah@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Or raise awareness to the criminal exploitation migrants suffer to just get a position on the boats

      No, I’ve seen plenty of reporting on that. Never on the reasons they’re trying to get a position in the first place though.

      • Pronell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Well then, they don’t report because the reason varies from migrant to migrant. Usually there will be a line or two in the report about where and possibly why, but anything past that means they have to interview someone who isn’t in a position to be interviewed.

        • rah@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          because the reason varies from migrant to migrant

          I don’t see why varying reasons for getting in boats justifies not reporting on those reasons.

          Usually there will be a line or two in the report about … possibly why

          I’ve never seen such a line. Can you provide a reference to one?

          someone who isn’t in a position to be interviewed

          What do you mean by this?

          • Pronell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Those reasons aren’t known, so must be assumed. The migrants are typically arriving illegally and don’t want the attention of interviews.

            Lastly, I’m 50, and can’t document my memory but typically I would listen to news on something like NPR and they would say that a migrant boat was captured, say, from Greece, and say that there’s extremely high unemployment there. Other reasons given would be natural disasters, outbreaks of violence, lack of food, etc.

            • rah@feddit.ukOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Those reasons aren’t known

              What makes you think that?

              The migrants are typically arriving illegally and don’t want the attention of interviews.

              The migrants depart as well as arrive. I find it hard to believe that the media has no knowledge whatsoever of what kind of motives these people have. If they didn’t have such knowledge, I would expect them to at least state that the motives are unknown. Instead what I find is just a void of any mention of motivations whatsoever, to the point that it gives the appearance of an intentional blackout. Hence my question: why?

              Greece, and say that there’s extremely high unemployment there

              I think we’re talking about different phenomena here. This is the kind of thing I’m talking about, which isn’t Greek citizens looking for work:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_European_migrant_crisis

              Edit: I see you’re talking about NPR which I believe is American. To be clear I’m talking about British media. Perhaps foreign media doesn’t have the same appearance of a blackout.