Tariffs are not a new concept and have been used historically to build economies. Top China analysts in the Obama administration credited its economic rise to protective tariffs and high barriers to entry for any foreign companies to sell in country.

I’m probably a bit older than most lemmy users and remember when tariffs were a major talking point for democrats as a positive thing to protect American jobs. Hell, growing up in the Midwest, all my dad and his buddies that worked union jobs had to vote democrat because of their aggressive tariff policy to protect their jobs.

So what if trump is right about tariffs and it reinvigorates the American economy? Will people find another reason to credit the success to? Will it be the end of blue collar voting for the democrats?

Edit: Markets are rebounding hard, I bought low, glad Lemmy is full of pseudo intellectual economic morons. How is Lemmy going to cope now?

  • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    4 days ago

    He is not.

    A tariff is a tax that increases the price of imported goods.

    Tariffs are used to push people toward domestic alternatives to imported goods.

    However, today, there are no domestic alternatives to most important goods.

    So, all it’s doing is increasing the burden on the average person.

    Companies are not going to invest in domestic production. They are going to spend that money lobbying to have tarriffs removed. Because guess what? Once tariffs go away, consumer prices are not going to go back to what they used to be. Instead, megacorps are going to pocket the difference as profit.

  • mapumbaa@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tariffs will be super hard on american economy. There is no universe where current tariffs and migration policy wont mean stagflation from hell. But that’s a price that might be worth/necessary paying. However, if american blue collar are able to organize, there is a possibility that blue collar salaries will keep up with inflation and that implies economic power is transferred to the working clas (supply and demand will be on the side of blue collar at least). Transfer of economic (and political) power is very much needed if the US democracy shall survive (or return from the dead).

    But it’s all a big gamble for sure. Chaos and feudalism/fascism is probably the most likely outcome. Everything is so complex that it’s impossible to know for sure. Hopefully evolution has empowered us with enough accurate intuitions.

  • mmddmm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes, as you said, they aren’t a new concept. We have plenty of evidence, of countries that tried that again and again. We know what he is doing is stupid.

    Besides, your theory on tariffs won’t even get to be tested. Kidnapping people at random on the street and sending them to concentration camps has an overwhelmingly larger impact on the economy than the tariffs. People from outside of the US will only focus at this if you start to invade other countries, but at this point, nobody inside the US should be concerned with tariffs, at all.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    He isn’t. He can’t be; not the way he has handled them.

    Bringing industry and manufacturing back to US soil is actually not a bad idea at all but it’s a problem that needs to be tackled smartly and over a period of time so businesses can react. He is trying to force decades worth of economic migration in the span of a few months. For (hopefully) obvious reasons, that is impossible and the US economy is about to collapse.

    And considering Trump, along with Musk at DOGE, have systematically destroyed economic and social safety-net programs… the aftermath of this is going to be catastrophic. The only way Trump is “right” about these tariffs is that they are an intentional sabotage of the US economy so him and his wealthy backers can cash out as the walls come crashing down. That is the goal and it’s going according to plan.

  • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I suspect he is right. These tariffs will torpedo the economy just as intended.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    That would certainly be quite surprising. The expression of Trump being right is flexible enough to be interpreted in various ways.

    The only plausible way would be if he achieves some largely meaningless concessions and the media spins it as a win. But if the American electorate gets the idea that the US can get free stuff by throwing a fit, then any agreement is not worth the paper it is written on.

    Well, I guess that’s the answer. If Trump achieves anything positive with this, then the reaction with be self-destructive.

    Do you have any particular scenario in mind that ends with Trump being vindicated?

      • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        What rebounding are you talking about? The Dow Jones is at a currently stable 10% lower than 1 last month. I don’t exactly see a rebound there, except the short high some high hours ago, which then decreased again.

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      I disagree: there are no stupid questions - but there are loaded questions, questions with wrong assumptions baked in or statements with a questionmark attached.

      Small difference but I found my life way better when differentiating between “person doesn’t know l” and “person wants to be a troll”.

  • Drewmeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    He won’t be right about tariffs because he (and you, I suppose) has a gross misunderstanding about how tariffs should be implemented. Tariffs are typically used to strengthen a local product. Say that we wanted to support Napa wine. We might introduce a tarrif on importing wines from our largest competitors. This would increase the cost of the foreign product in relation to the domestic product and encourage consumers to buy locally. So, why won’t this work if we just tarrif everyone for everything? Well, we don’t make everything so they’re isn’t a local option to buy instead. Not just for you, but for the companies that make the things you consume. Oh, then let’s just build up the industries to make everything. Even disregarding that we don’t have the ability to produce everything due to, well, climate and resources, that would cost many millions of dollars and years of investment before seeing a profit. Which is a nice idea if businesses had any faith that the tariffs are permanent, which they don’t not only because the current administration (likely lol) won’t be in power forever, but also because the current administration has said that they are willing to negotiate. So why bother making the investment when you can import again soon? And lastly, if we try to strong-arm everyone at the same time, they’ll just band together without us. They don’t need to trade with us if they have an alternative in a more profitable trade partner, and we’ve just incentivized the entire world to look for a better option than us. We did that. All at once. The idiocy is frankly astounding.

  • T Jedi@bolha.forum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The same way they’ll react if someone is right about the Earth being flat.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    The question is inconsequential.

    The empirical and historical information we have demonstrates that this is a patently stupid policy.

  • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Most people who aren’t right-wing nut jobs know how to admit when they’re wrong about something and how to be happy for something that actually is a positive for the majority of people who aren’t already rich, regardless of how that result was achieved.

    Tariffs are normal, they encourage a strong local economy that doesn’t get screwed over by a dominant economy that decides to use the trade relationship against the local economy, but they haven’t been “aggressive” since the last time they were used as an act of war and ended up causing a depression.

    • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tariffs are normal, they encourage a strong local economy that doesn’t get screwed over by a dominant economy that decides to use the trade relationship against the local economy

      But America was that dominant economy, right up until the tarrifs were imposed. Now it’s more like we’re brexiting ourselves.

    • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right? Like I’d LOVE to be proven wrong and for this to actually help our economy and the middle class. It’s just that I’m realistic and can see that this is much more likely to lead us to a recession instead