There isn’t https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/1902-2D54-E445-59DD

Maximum friend list size seems to be capped at 2000 though

That’s a better explanation, but Steam still allows for much bigger friends list if you craft badges, so pay, but not for specifically paying games

Apart from Steam, which platform does that?

Many people don’t know that’s a thing in Steam btw

You also need to test genuine images to check the real accuracy

In some games, they’re public by default then you should make them private. I’m thinking of Dying Light for example

Why are friend list size limits a thing? Except for UI, it shouldn’t be a problem. And a simple search feature fixes the problem

The comments are insane

Are they really accurate?

Damn

IP Address?

if you’re using the mobile apps then yea you’re fucked, don’t do that

I still fail to see how anarchism inherently wants to make salaries and income more even

That’s an extension that belongs to a branch of anarchism, it is not supposed to be like this by definition

Removed by mod

USA is already at nightmare level, and the big difference is the USA will use it against you where China can’t really reach you

Anyways, I would appreciate any proof or comparison between the two

The wikipedia definition doesn’t seem to agree with what you’re saying.

Removed by mod

How does it compare to tesla in terms of privacy, ownership (DRM) and stuff?

It ends up more as an opinion circlejerk than a safe space.

When you ban people disagreeing with you, you’re not making anyone feel safer, you’re just comforting yourself in a confirmation bias group where only one voice can be heard

When you ban people by stating they’re transphobic when they’re not, you’re being authoritarian and misleading. It ends up with active misinformation because either you’re with them, or you must fuck off. A sect.

When the concept of a safe space goes from no judgment and kindness to a political space, I believe it will have a negative impact.

But maybe it’s just me being pissed off at the abusive moderation

Income inequalities don’t implicitly imply a hierarchy in terms of authority over other people

Anarchism mainly rejects the state’s hierarchy. It doesn’t make it left or right

Also knowing that left and right will often rely on the state to push their ideas and rules

both are often linked

Enforcing your opinion while banning people not agreeing is pretty authoritarian to me

blahaj is authoritarian. Them not liking tankies doesn’t mean they’re not the exact same with their ideas. Ada is a perfect example of this.

[email protected] doesn’t exist for no reason