6·
1 day agoThat’s not excuse though.
According to the words Vance said in EU, if a democracy is threatened by digital advertising, then it is not a strong democracy.
If your argument is true, and a vote can be biased by the amount of times a voter watches an advertisement, then elections are simply a matter of who has the most money.
Other countries have rules about these things, like how long before an election they can start advertising, they have to show where the money for it came from, they prohibit money from abroad to be used in campaigns, they have to say what party paid for the add etc.
USA is actively working against these rules and calling it the right of free speech.
It wouldn’t be an action if it didn’t require some action. It would be a non action if it didn’t require you to pay in one way or the other.
Sometimes having to pay more, is the action and is part of being more ecological, more moral, political or standing your ground
You can’t be an activist without action