My parents owned a cat who loved to go on walks with them, but would complain loudly if the walk was too long, and demand to return to the house when she was done walking. It was such a problem that they started shutting the cat in the house when they wanted to walk, and so she would hide outside and follow them secretly until they were too far along with the walk to bring her back to the house and continue without her, and then trot up and join them on the walk. Then shortly she would complain that the walk was too long and she wanted to go back now.

We love her

Little few-dozen-people towns like this in the middle of nowhere are fucking wild sometimes. It’s just a bunch of people doing whatever they want, for the most part. Sometimes it’s fine, sometimes it’s real fucked and people who grow up and leave have some insane stories and basically never go back.

Remember this when someone tells you “voting is a waste of time” “anarchism is better, we don’t need all these corrupt structures” or similar things. There’s a reason why we settled on the systems we have. The corruption that fucks them up is real, sure, and it’s a big problem, but it also exists in exactly the same form if you get rid of the system. It actually gets way worse.

It is funny that in Piefed this topic is classified under “Chilling”

Man, some wild shit is going to happen before 2032. All of this is one scenario, yes, maybe, but this stuff is like weather forecasting on the Titanic at this point.

That’s all it’s ever been. These nations rise and fall like villages in the Ice Age. We just have media and systems to make it look like everything is all organized and “professional” now, and it kind of is sometimes, but at the end of the day we’re still living on the same uncaring planet by the same rules.

There’s a pretty good book called “Playing With Fire” about the politics of the late 60s and the events of the time. I had to stop reading it, it’s too sad. Bobby Kennedy talking to the crowd after MLK was shot, not knowing that he was going to be dead the same way a short time later, just fucked me up, I put it down.

Nothing, as far as I can tell.

I have only the vaguest of vague impressions, but my vague impression is that he’s been quite a good actor in other things, but then with Doctor Who they kept giving him terrible scripts.

She did do acting before she did comedy, probably nothing anyone’s ever seen.

It looks like I’m not alone in having the impression that the most recent seasons were badly received: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0436992/ratings/

I don’t think it was that gender “was an issue” or anything. Like I say I thought it was just kind of generally understood that the recent seasons just weren’t very good, but it looks from the comments like that’s not the Lemmy consensus, so be it.

Maybe you don’t like the actress

No idea about her or anything upcoming. I thought it was universally accepted that the recent seasons of the Doctor were horrible, but it looks like I’m alone in that. Oh well. Anyway, my main point about this was that Fern Brady would do great.

My phrasing was bad. Both the gender-swapped and the current “dancing in the crosswalk” Doctor Who attempts were dogshit. Fern Brady would actually fit the emotional timbre of the classic Doctors while also happening to be modern and female, was my point.

This is one of the last levels of safeguard: At the end of the day, public opinion matters for whether or not you can put people in prison (or even put them through the life-changingly traumatic and expensive experience of a major criminal trial.)

They are trying to change that, of course. George W. introducing whole new systems that were outside the normal constitutional safeguards was deeply horrifying to a lot of people, because it laid the groundwork which Trump is now so many years later building his camps on.

I 100% believe that JFK was killed because he was serious about trying to bring some humanity to the US government.

Many issues at play:

1. In the same way that a lot of people with powerful friends in the city depend on new highway projects, new community centers, new programs being set up, so that their friends can get paid, people in the US government with powerful friends depend on new wars so that everyone can sell weapons and continue to have good quarters.
2. The US military benefits enormously from getting a ton of practice. We’re trying to run an empire, and very often big militaries get lazy because their countries do so well that they don’t really have to be scrappy, and people get complacent. War is so shocking and challenging that the only way to really stay good at it is to be doing it. And so, that’s exactly what the US does.
3. The US has its fingers in so many pies so to speak that all kinds of shit that happens globally we determine to be our business. Civil war in Syria? Holy shit, better make sure the right people win. Let’s go fuck up some irregular forces that don’t have helicopters or satellite support.

Do they? When did this happen? I know they arrest people for “Plasticine Action” T-shirts.

Germany’s been doing fucked up stuff for a while. People have literally had the police visit and gotten citations for what they said online (for example calling a politician a “penis” on social media.) It’s fucked.

Inb4 they pretty much don’t do a fucking thing, and we start seeing commercials and public perception about how bad and fake this whole “government internet” thing is

Welcome to the United States, where the rich people get socialism and the poors get prison

Is it opposite day or something? I could swear I literally gave a counterexample in the message you’re replying to lol

Biden: I’m going to have Dept of Education forgive half a trillion dollars in student loans

Supreme Court: Excuse me, fuck no

Trump: Hey I’m just gonna direct the awesome power of the US government to do literally whatever I personally want

Supreme Court: Yeah sounds good

This interview is really phenomenal. Among other things, they talk about why it took so many years to release the game.

“We’ve been having fun,” Gibson said. “This whole thing is just a vehicle for our creativity anyway. It’s nice to make fun things.”

The lengthy production wasn’t the result of development challenges or obstacles, they said. They just needed all these years to ensure that Silksong was exactly the game they wanted to make.

“It was never stuck or anything,” Gibson said. “It was always progressing. It’s just the case that we’re a small team, and games take a lot of time. There wasn’t any big controversial moment behind it.”

“I think we’re always underestimating the amount of time and effort it’ll take us to achieve things,” Gibson said. “It’s also that problem where, because we’re having fun doing it, it’s not like, ‘It’s taking longer, this is awful, we really need to get past this phase.’ It’s, ‘This is a very enjoyable space to be in. Let’s perpetuate this with some new ideas.’”

The longer development lasted, the more pressure Gibson and Pellen felt to ensure that everything was as fine-tuned as possible. They’d already spent four years on it — why would they rush now? The more time they spent polishing some parts, the more time they needed to apply it consistently across the rest.

“There’s a level of finish that has to be met throughout the entire game,” Pellen said. “All the way the systems interact, all the hidden work that pops up later on. It’s multiplicative. As you add stuff, the process of tying it all back together just increases.”

Gibson and Pellen say they’re happy that the game is finally coming out — and even happier that they will get to keep working on it, which they still find enjoyable even after seven years. They haven’t burned out or shown any desire to take a break. Instead, they’re already making big plans to add extra content to Silksong in the months and years to come.

This is, of course, what work is supposed to be. But we have lost the way.