• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • Commit to renewables. I’d advocate for a nuclear powered off-ramp from fossils whilst renewable capacity and infrastructure is built, but I get that each nation has its own history with fission.

    Energy security is fundamental for a robust society and economy - otherwise you’re subject to pipeline shutoffs/attacks, oil embargoes/quotas, or another angle for outside nations to influence or control you. For example, if you’re chill with the French and build your economic strategy around buying their surplus energy, that strategy predicated on the French having a surplus to sell you.


  • That’s American, Jewish voters surveyed last fall. 68% support land swaps, an independent Palestinian state based on the 1967 borders, Palestinian return from the diaspora, and financial/population restitution.

    A lot of regular people get swept up into the default of supporting the concept of Israel and protecting the lives of the 6-7 million Jews living there, but the topic has so many land mines and risks of misunderstanding that people don’t delve into the topic openly. But if you look for it, there’s a lot of silence from folks who are uneasy about the direction Israel is headed.




  • If you’re a (western) European leader returning to Russian energy is at best shortsighted amnesia, at worst blatant malfeasance. There’s several reasons to not go back to Russia:

    • Official legal based sanctions on Russian energy
    • Ukrainian drone based ‘sanctions’ on Russian energy
    • Russia’s track record of energy blackmail/hybrid warfare
    • LNG and oil production available in your EEZ/the EU, albeit at higher cost than imported
    • Domestic solar, hydro, and wind manufacturing/generation is ramping up
    • French nuclear energy exports
    • Domestic politics ie. voters turning against Russian imperial aggression/expansionism

    Eastern Europe has a slightly different incentive mix, but there’s still a lot of reasons to not






  • People passing by and getting a temporary snapshot with their eyes? No problem

    A tech monopoly putting photos online, for anyone anywhere at any time to see, and constantly updating the photos? Thats a problem.

    Without even thinking hard I can imagine several malicious uses like stalkers finding their victims home, or burglars casing neighborhoods for gates or cameras.

    You naïveté does not define the norm for everyone else. Would you livestream video on the internet of your front door online, 24/7? Of course not.



  • I can’t handle the fact that sex is complex and it’s ok to need to work on it and figure out what works for both partners

    There’s working on it, and trying to flex on Twitter. After-care is working on it. Discussing go/no-gos or dominance roles is working on it. Asking why she’s not invested is working on it.

    “You can’t handle me” is a dismissal I have seen used on the ’alphas’ who won’t take a hint that she’s not interested


  • Edit: Man the downvotes, y’all really are telling on yourselves

    Imagine telling on yourself like this lmao

    I am so bad at pleasuring my partner that I have only experienced women tolerating me via starfishing

    I see no reason to question why these women aren’t more invested in sex with me; clearly she is a lazy pillow princess and not me who is the problem

    Also super gross how we’ve normalized/coerced women into “lying back and taking it” instead of asking why shes not active and engaged




  • I’m no lawyer, but the legal system calls this “reasonable doubt” and if you are on a jury, you are duty bound to do your best to judge the case on the facts, not vibes.

    And the fact is, a grainy photo of two people who may have somewhat similar clothing is not proof, nor mens rea required for a possible murder conviction - who are we to claim to understand the mind of this individual?

    The state has a high bar to clear that this anonymous shopper, is the same person they claim, the photo was taken on the same day, that this photo isn’t a forgery/deepfake, that only one set of that particular clothing was ever sold- otherwise it’s hearsay and conjecture.