Local radio station said that von der Leyen has her critics, but most think she done well.

Who? Who thinks she done well? I have yet to see any prominent Europeans that think she came out of this looking well or with a good deal.

Need a new president of the EU commission that can actually fucking negotiate.

Not all of them, but that’s what meta is trying to get at. “Your laws stop us from marketing you u to the masses”

Fuck 'em. I hope I live to watch meta crumble to shit and everything like it.

It’s her script. A lot to research and learn

The government parties do. That’s who they’re targeting with this ‘news’.

Any government party seen bending to the metatwats can fuck off too. But unfortunately they really want the exposure to show the kids how hip they are.

They should also fuck off

TV Bro - https://github.com/truefedex/tv-bro

DTVFree - https://github.com/InukaAsith/DTVfree

Both mentioned here - https://github.com/Generator/Awesome-Android-TV-FOSS-Apps

deleted by creator

Strawberries, blackberries, mulberries, and raspberries are not berries.

Bananas, aubergine (eggplants), oranges and grapes are berries.

Dangleberries aren’t real berries either.

In Ireland they’re watching the mess with the trains and water unfold for years, and their government are making moves to privatise their water and trains.

Wasn’t her show (and her probably) cancelled in the states after she was accused of bullying, and then accused her accusers of being misogynistic? I doubt Trump has anything to do with her new fame seeking agenda.

My point was that individuals have been responsible for a lot worse, but never held accountable. It didn’t have to be rivers and fish. I could have linked to the endless other articles referring to the destruction of something. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cmjj5gl6m0po

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2dlr05rr1lo

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/anglian-water-fined-300-000-after-pollution-killed-5-000-fish

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/feb/27/southern-water-fined-330000-for-stream-pollution-that-killed-2000-fish

https://www.watermagazine.co.uk/2023/01/19/anglian-water-fined-over-half-a-million-pounds-after-raw-sewage-discharge-killed-5000-fish-in-northamptonshire-river/

Not one CEO properly held accountable by the law (I could have listed another 30 different cases easily. Just searching polluted river and killed fish fined uk)

Instead of teaching iOS, Android and Windows users in schools, we could save millions and tech on Linux. More children learning = more growing up and using Linux.

Get FOSS into schools ahead of the big tech.

They are all anti-Semitic… 🥴

/S

YouTube is not a ‘single thing’. If you don’t understand the buy European movement works or the privacy issues behind the bigtechs, then that’s on you.

Unff…

Because people like her aren’t using the alternatives that they are claiming to promote.

There are other alternatives with plenty of content.

https://alternativeto.net/software/youtube/?origin=europe

This person earning money by using the buy European platform is akin to Greenwashing, as mentioned for buy European. As for purity-testing, how many “influencers” is too many for something like this? What are they influencing mostly, the usage of YouTube to make money or the fact that they don’t use the alternatives that they are supposedly promoting? I’ve not checked, but does this influencer have any accounts on the European alternatives? Social media or video hosting sites? If not, then this is self promotion more than promoting the movement, or whatever you choose to call it.

Why doesn’t she start the video pointing to the alternative video sites that the video is also posted on, and save some viewers from the privacy issues that come with the big tech sites?

I’ve no problem with letting people watch what they like, but as she’s obviously getting paid by YouTube as an influencer, I’m pretty sure this is just the ‘buy European’ version of Greenwashing.

I don’t disagree, but literally looking for followers on one of the biggest platforms owned by one of the ‘bigtech’ biggest tech, as an “influencer” kinda defeats the whole purpose. Also, she’s not ‘starting a movement’.

Relying on people to go to YouTube to watch the video that more than likely just points at things already written and linked to on the sites that have already gained a massive following without YouTube is not unnecessary, but it is unneeded.