• Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder how many diabetics this accounts for, of the total number of diabetics.

    I’m diabetic. 25 year marijuana user, too. I weigh 115 lbs. I’m underweight even for my height. Family is all/mostly skinny, some diabetic some not. I’m the only regular marijuana user. So I don’t get it. Probably because I’m hiiiigh (just kidding).

      • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure. I understand that part. It’s the not becoming overweight part due to marijuana that also isn’t happening.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      None it is a dishonest study commissioned for the purpose of a negative headline. To start at it is bad and engineer a study to come to that conclusion.

      This is a well fleshed out industry. Just like the makers of toxic pesticides or pfas will do to justify their business.

      It is amazing people are not more wise to this by now. But look at our politicians, even our better politicians and I guess I should not be surprised. People still trust Authority. Everyone trusts the wrong people.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        There are some true aspects to what you’re saying in the overall field of publishing, but the article doesn’t read that way.

        Did you read it? What conflict of interest can you spot? What aspects of it (besides the clickbait title) sound like a commissioned study to you?

        • hector@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          The anti cannabis people have zero credibility. They have been lying through their teeth, since before we were born.