I’m thinking either Bic lighters or cigarettes, just to trade

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      5 days ago

      This really is it. Sure, a high water ratio soup would provide both nourishment and fluids for living, but basic clean water allows for cleaning and the ability to grow food or trade for other stuff.

      Plus truly unlimited means you can start your own river to help society recover!

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you are going that route: Rule of 3

      3 minutes without oxygen. 3 days without water. 3 weeks without food (I think it is also “3 hours without shelter” but that is a much more environmental factor and feels shoehorned in). And, depending on the apocalypse, clean air can be hard to come by.

      • DecaturNature@yall.theatl.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, obviously need the first that that will kill you. We take breathable air for granted. But if you need an infinite supply of clean air, you are probably dead anyway. An infinite supply of water has many uses beyond drinking and hygine – irrigation, power, and cooling come to mind as very useful post-apocalypse.

  • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Milk, given an unlimited supply i won’t have to worry about it spoiling. Gives a decent amount of nutrients and water and can use it to make cheese or butter eventually, And is a life without cheese and butter really worth living?

  • lb_o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Will “fully equipped cruize ship” count as one item? Then I can scavenge them for all parts required to build new civilization.

    And if it is not, then question to OP, what is the limit for the composite items to stop being counted as one item?

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    What flavor of apocalypse matters a lot. If it’s zombies, ammo becomes critical. If it’s nuclear, ammo is less important and water filtration probably becomes critical. If it’s a gigantic asteroid that blots out the sun, water is easy to find but food is critical.

    For an unknown apocalypse, I think I’ll go with gasoline. Not critical in and of itself, but helps a lot more generally with a lot of stuff, being able to power a generator and move camp more easily.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not a single mention of bullets? Seriously?

    In an apocalypse, ammunition will be worth more than gold.

    • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Maybe in a zombie apocalypse, but what are you gonna do with bullets in a regular apocalypse?

      You may be the only person you’ll ever see for years at a time. You can’t drink them, you can’t plant them, you can’t build with them.

      You could probably use them on yourself if you’ve got a gun that they work in, though, especially if that’s the only one item you decided to choose for long-term survival. 😮

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The bullets aren’t for the zombies…

        They wouldn’t be much of an issue after a year anyway, but ammo will still be extremely valuable, especially if you’re trying to rebuild society. Gonna need something to defend yourself with against invasions from rival gangs.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gonna need something to defend yourself with against invasions from rival gangs.

          Bullets won’t protect you against an intentionally set fire to your home or base. Without laws, it won’t be gun vs gun situation.

          That said, it would really depend on the type of apocalypse we’re talking about.

          Massive natural disaster? Nuclear? Pandemic? “Zombies”? Global drought? A breakdown of society?

          Bullets might be fine depending on the situation. You might not even survive long enough to use them.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Beans. Not only about the most important food source, legumes are also natural nitrogen fixers for soil health.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      thank you for being on this platform and being so positive. I enjoy seeing your posts and they somehow give me motivation to keep my chin up and be more outgoing with someone I recently met at the dog park who’s acting curiously shy and different from most people.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    A) Something to trade (rely on others)

    B) Something for ME to survive on (rely on nobody)

    C) Something to rebuild (everyone relies on me)

    I generally lean towards rebuilding, but it really depends on what apocalypse we’re talking about here. Zombie? Nuclear war? Asteroid? Nazis? Waterworld?

    So, assuming I can survive enough, I’d pick rebuild critical tech like rubber or a way to forge steel or a critical chemical. Think, “Doctor Stone”.

    But if I need to survive like a water world or a desert world or a zombie outbreak, what I pick is going to be pretty fucking different. Cigarettes don’t mean shit if there’s no water. Water don’t mean shit if that’s all you have. And none of that matters if you’re stuck in a world with aerosolized zombie infection that results in smart running zombies that fast heal.