• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    That’s why you use unit test and integration test.

    I can write bad code myself or copy bad code from who-knows where. It’s not something introduced by LLM.

    Remember famous Linus letter? “You code this function without understanding it and thus you code is shit”.

    As I said, just a tool like many other before it.

    I use it as a regular practice while coding. And to be true, reading my code after that I could not distinguish what parts where LLM and what parts I wrote fully by myself, and, to be honest, I don’t think anyone would be able to tell the difference.

    It would probably a nice idea to do some kind of turing test, a put a blind test to distinguish the AI written part of some code, and see how precisely people can tell it apart.

    I may come back with a particular piece of code that I specifically remember to be an output from deepseek, and probably withing the whole context it would be indistinguishable.

    Also, not all LLM usage is for copying from it. Many times you copy to it and ask the thing yo explain it to you, or ask general questions. For instance, to seek for specific functions in C# extensive libraries.