• rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    At sufficiently low orbits, the satellites would simply deorbit themselves because of the atmospheric drag. Several Starlink sats have been lost this way.

    • ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, more thinking the wasted time, resources, and emissions involved in building, launching, managing, and then whenever makes it down.

      Take all that and make something useful instead, whatever happened to Google fiber being built out all over? More reliable, faster, doesn’t involve sending piles of redundant satellites into space…

      • popcap200@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Supposedly traditional ISP’s have tons and tons of lawyers and filed every single step of the way to stop Google from intruding on their local monopolies.

      • rtxn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I don’t know about the ozone layer specifically, but reentry turns the satellite into danger dust – mostly metal oxides and burnt polymers. Ozone, being a very strong oxidizer, is the most likely to react with the hot debris, so it probably does damage the ozone layer, but I can’t quantify the damage, or the released pollutants.

      • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        When they say “burn up on reentry” they don’t mean disintegrate, they mean burn. It’s exactly like throwing thousands of home entertainment systems in a fire except that the pollution is in the upper atmosphere where normal pollution doesn’t reach.