• Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’ll admit, I’m not deep in astronomy but thats inherently misguided. In a 3d space, observing from a fixed point, all areas that extend past how far we can observe would not be the shape of the universe but just our range of “vision.”

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Thus the term “observable universe”. Everything beyond our observable universe is being expanded away from us at faster than the speed of light, so nothing outside will ever reach us. Causality is completely and irrevocably severed at those distances so, arguably, anything outside the observable universe is not part of “our” universe.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        My point is, it doesn’t reveal anything about the nature of the universe only about the limited view we can observe. As far as form goes the form of a sphere is meaningless because it is true of anything in a 3d space that is looking out from a fixed point.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          As I just explained, it’s not really about observation, it’s about causation. If two objects can never possibly interact, then are they really in the same universe?

          Looking out in space is also looking back in time. Anything (roughly) that is further than we can observe in the microwave background would be further back in time than the beginning of time, and therefore doesn’t exist at all in our universe. It’s a bit brain bending.

              • NotLemming@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I guess I don’t trust the human understanding of ‘never’. It’s more like ‘we don’t currently believe its possible’, which has in the past been unreliable.

                • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  We’d need to break the speed of light, which isn’t possible with our current understanding of physics, but who knows.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I would say yes they are part of the same universe because if you changed your position it would reveal things you didn’t see before and mask thing you use to see. Not that that is possible yet, but there are no laws of physics preventing it, only our super short life spans.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              That’s just it. The laws of physics, at least as far as we understand them, absolutely preclude changing our position in any way that would reveal anything outside our observable universe. Lifespans don’t come into it at all. If you lived forever traveling at the speed of light, you would never achieve that change of position.

              The cosmic background is the leftover “noise” of the big bang, and we observe it roughly uniformly in every single direction. So where did the big bang occur? Everywhere. Everything that exists is precisely at the center of the universe, right where the big bang happened.

              It’s all about the concept of spacetime. Spacetime isn’t space and time considered together, it’s a singular thing that operates by rules that we are ill equiped to comprehend intuitively.