• frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Pirating Harry Potter stuff is now not only a moral thing to do, but almost a moral obligation.

    • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’d say just don’t engage with it at all.

      If someone talks about it, pretend ignorance. Like total ignorance of any aspect of the stories.

      Or, if someone mentions it, just say you don’t give bigots money.

      Editing to expand: by pirating you are perpetuating the cultural impact. The majority of people pay for access to this media, and by engaging with it you make it more costly for other people to skip it.

      • FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Even if you pirated, speaking about the movies will encourage other people to watch it, and they might not pirate it. It’s indirect, but it could still give that transphobic doll money

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have always hated Harry Potter. I hated Harry before it was cool to hate Harry.

      I’m a mother fucking golden hipster God!

  • "Omega" (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s one thing to still support someone despite them having some problematic opinions on the side. I do it, you probably do it, it annoys the shit out of me to know that this thing that I like is made by someone who shares opinion with which I strongly disagree with, sometimes that are even against me, personally, as a trans person.

    But not understanding something, being ignorant and being kind of an asshole about it, is very different than what this hateful bitch is doing. She has dedicated her entire life to make people like me fucking miserable. And it’s working!

    I’m having a very hard time reconciling the fact that lots of people love Harry Potter and some people in my entourage are the same and they will support and pay for stuff made by this horrendous person regardless because this universe means that much to them. My sister is like that. I’m having a very hard time with that. I don’t want to be that person… but fuck this hurts.

    The worst part is that most people don’t know about it. Most people don’t know how much of a hateful, awful person J.K. Rowling is. And I have to admit, those people in my life, I’m genuinely afraid of telling them. Because I know that there is a chance that I’ll tell them everything, and that in the end, they won’t change a thing. Because my rights as a human being matters less to them. And I don’t want to find that out…

    I hate everything about this.

    • mogranja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m not trans, but I feel your pain. It sucks, a lot. Why do people have to be so hateful?

    • Googledotcom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I think that you shouldn’t tell people to stop enjoying what they love but to stop buying and funding her campaign.

      It is hard to convince people to give up on their interests but it is reasonable to tell them where the money goes.

      I myself I am mostly pirating all stuff. I could even help someone pirate it and do it for them. I think they would understand and agree to it. I would add that If they buy something from hp we are not friends/family anymore but if you ask me to pirate it then we could watch it together.

      That’s my advice on how to approach this in a reasonable manner and if you need help pirating any hp stuff PM me and I will explain how to set everything up

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      First, let me start with saying I am sorry. Currently, the world seems very preoccupied with cocks and vagina’s and who should have what. (Kinda weird, but yeah).

      I love Harry Potter. It was the first series of books that really resonated with me. It is really sad to see that someone, who came from nothing and gained it all. Could live the dream, have all the money and affection, is such a massive cunt.

      Yet somehow, it doesn’t make me stop loving Harry Potter. When reading the books again, it reminds me of my childhood. Me reading at 2:00 in the morning underneath the blankets with a pocket light in me mouth to not let anyone know I am not sleeping. Daydreaming about such a world where magic exist.

      The solution, I am afraid, is something I cannot provide. Money buys news, news poisons the minds. I stand for humanity, and all humans. No matter which configuration. And if someone wants to have a nice pair of tits and cunt instead of a dick, go on and have your merry life.

      I don’t know if this is helpful or not. What is your solution?

      • DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t know, there’s a lot of racism and anti-Semitism in those books as well. I mean the money obsessed long nose goblins? Cho Chang?

        They’re good stories, but they do reflect the work of a fundamentally biggoted author.

        • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          In general the entire series is mean-spirited. You can see the roots of Rowling’s hate in how she describes any of the series antagonists.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      It is important to separate art and artist.

      People get a lot of comfort out of religious text knowing next to nothing about the author(s).

      This also means you can hate on JK Rowling without making any connection to HP.

      • julysfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You can separate the art from the artist for sure but when people are buying HP branded stuff, they are directly contributing to this.

          • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’ll admit this is easier for me because I was never a huge HP fan. But I don’t even pirate it because I don’t want to increase its cultural impact. I don’t even want to seed the torrent, and leeches suck. I want Harry Potter to disappear because even after Rowling dies, the profits will go towards a transphobic foundation.

            In some cases piracy increases total revenue by getting more people interested in the product.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              The product itself isn’t bad. But you do have a point.

              Let’s compare Orsen Scott Card and Rowling. I’m never going to be pressured into taking kids to an Enders Game theme park, but piracy will make Univeral theme parks (and therefore Rowling) lots more money. Disney made more money from selling Churros than streaming.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you are going down that road then there are much big targets to aim at. Are you also applying the same anger (and logic) to organised religion?

          The same arguments apply and they are multiple times more powerful than Rowling.

          • WillStealYourUsername@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yeah okay, you are not being genuine. That much is clear now. This is a post about J. K. Rowling using profits from her IP to fund transphobia. People run in to defend the franchise, we try to explain how giving her money means more policies against us is bad, and then you object to that?

            Ofc we are talking about HP in the HP post. Why would I talk about religion here? She gave a significant meaningful amount of money to fund hate against me, and she continues to be influential and use her and her IPs popularity to make peoples lives harder.

            Why do you think I don’t speak up against any church or organization funding hate and bigotry? You are not being genuine.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              giving her money means more policies against us is bad, and then you object to that?

              No, you went further and are hating on people liking HP. You are attacking the art not the artist. I am defending art in general. I am not defending Rowling at all or encouraging funding for her. Everyone should pirate anything HP related.

              Why would I talk about religion here?

              Because you are confusing the art and the artist. That precedent should not be allowed no matter the topic. (By equating religion to art I can make my point quicker. Note I’m not choosing any religion in particular)

              Why do you think I don’t speak up against any church or organization funding hate and bigotry?

              Do you also try to stop people from believing in that religion? From reading those religious books? No. The art is separate.

              You are not being genuine.

              I’m highlighting how art and artist are separate. No-one should feel guilty about enjoying a fictional book.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        It is important to separate art and artist.

        I completely disagree, both on a subjective selfish aesthetic level, and on a moral level.

        On the aesthetic side, you’re doing yourself a huge disservice by making this separation. You’re missing out on this whole other dimension a piece of art has to offer you; namely the context that the author operates in. Star Wars gains this whole other rich level of interpretation if you consider the fact that George Lucas lived through the invasion of Vietnam and other forms of US imperialism and completely opposes it, for example. You’re missing out by ignoring the author.

        On the moral side, the argument is more obvious, I think. By ignoring the author you’re denying yourself the opportunity to spend your money and support folks in a way that aligns with your own morals. In my case, I consider trans people people, and think they deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. Since I know J K Rowling completely disagrees, I know that if I spend money on her, I will be putting money in the pocket of someone, and platforming them, who actively works against my morals. And I’m thankful for being able to know that spending money on her goes counter to my own morality.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Obviously if the authors views are reflected in the work then there isn’t a separation. HP is badly written with many failings, but it is enjoyable and not anti-trans itself. The art does not reflect the beliefs of the author.

          On the moral side, no money needs to be given directly or indirectly to Rowling.

          • wpb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            The art does not reflect the beliefs of the author.

            It really does though. The moral universe of Harry Potter says a lot about J K Rowling as a person, and there are many parallels with her own life. Morality in the Harry Potter universe is not inherent to an action, but to an actor. Is bullying bad? Depends on who does it. If a bad guy does it (for example the Dursleys), then it’s bad. If a good guy does it (Hagrid), then it’s good! There’s a parallel with the abolition of slavery about half way through the series, and it’s only one character doing it, and they’re the butt of the joke. And of course there’s Cho Chang and Blackie Shackleslave or whatever she called the one black character. The work speaks volumes about her, and vice versa. And you’re depriving yourself of this deeper level of analysis. You’re missing out.

            There’s a YouTuber called Shaun who’s done a thorough analysis of her work and its parallels with her dealings with nazis and fellow transphobes. It’s worth a watch.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is why the new tv series will be hated by all. They had a chance to remake and sanitize the series away from the grimy hands of JK and instead they doubled down. So if anything this remake might be even more offensive.

    The wild thing is that growing up I had all the conservatives and bible people trying to stop us kids from reading the demonic Harry Potter novels. Now that they realize the author is one of them, they suddenly love the books about witchcraft!

    • JandroDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unfortunately, they won’t be hated. A lot of people don’t actually care all that much about trans people :(

      • NeonNight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t think Hogwarts: Legacy doubled down, though? It’s definitely sad that she made money off that game being sold, but she didn’t have any hand in the writing. The game has trans characters and allows the player to be trans as well.

        • friendlysoviet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 days ago

          My comment was only to point out that the mainstream does not care about JKR’s take on trans people and that anything Harry Potter will print money, which is the opposite of OP’s take on things.

        • Ledericas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          she does profit from the IP being sold. and people were like defending the game and her transphobia.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They had a chance to remake and sanitize the series away from the grimy hands of JK

      Did they really? My impression was that she used her copyright control

  • shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    What a miserable person. More money than God and all she can do is sit around hating people she’s never met.

  • TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Boycotts work! Don’t watch her show on HBO and cancel your subscription after The Last of Us season finale of course. If her brand becomes toxic nobody will fund projects around it and she will fade into obscurity.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      To many people care more about their immediate shiny than any lasting harm their actions do in the world.

      Just look at how quickly the Nintendo Switch 2 sold out preorders, despite explicitly telling customers they won’t even own the device, and thus nintendo can fucking brick the thing whenever they want.

    • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t watch anything of hers on anything, like she’ll still be getting royalties for films.

  • MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    She’s such a scumbag. Had it all and ruined her name and art for what? To be hateful? Shame on her and shame on HBO for handing her more money and fueling her hate.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    rowling also wants to retcon the og cast members of the films, because they dont like to be associated with her transphobia.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I heard a YouTuber refer to her as Jeepers Kreepers Rowling recently, and it makes me giggle. What an awful woman.

  • 4F6C69766572@lemmy.lothians.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Imagine what good things could be done with the money instead of using it for stuff that’s non of her business. The older they get, the more conservative they turn out to be - sad for someone who brought a wonderful world to life once…

    • FryHyde@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean to be fair, if she’s going to make hating LGBT people her whole personality, we might as well make sure to keep mentioning how ACTIVE she is in her hate.

      It would be one thing if she had just said some nasty shit a decade ago, but this goofy lady wakes up and chooses violence every god damned day.

      • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Her twitter is mostly about trans people instead of HP too. She could have just kept quiet and kept having her PR team sweep all the transphobic tweets she was liking under the rug like they did early on before she went full mask off. But no, she wants to get rid of all the queer people and is actively working to try to make that happen.

        • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Last time she talked about Harry Potter on Twitter, she told everyone that wizards just used to shit themselves until someone invented the toilet.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        That’s the thing. I basically already assumed she more or less financed multiple terf organizations all by herself