• phantomwise@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Memes quickly assembled in Gimp should be sitting on a throne considering the skills required

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    AI needs to be treated with calm patience. It needs to be contained and observed so we can realise its potential in a safe, contained environment. Instead we’re immediately using it to replace what the wealthy don’t have and can never possess. Born-in talent. Artistry, humour. It’s what you can’t buy. It makes the people capable of creativity high value. And we can’t have that, can we?

    • mke@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s not just that. If it was, I’d have been convinced by the new-era freedom fighters using fucking ai horde, or whatever sloppers call their latest open-source [citation needed] model instance.

      The biggest issue is the shameless, continuous abuse of creative workers by sucking up all their works without consent.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve always seen the anti-AI movement as pro-corporation. It’s mostly for the benefit of the copyright industry while its already quite easy to decouple yourself from the corporate aspects of AI with its open source options.

      • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        that implies it’s the corporations that make art. the idea of art coming from corps is already a gross injustice to artists, but at least they can get paid a little. to take away what they do entirely for something that literally only remixes existing art from past and present artists is one of the darkest things we’re coming to accept in our late stage capitalist society.

        we simply do not want artists anymore. we’d rather the machines preform every task that’s worth doing so that we can all go slave away at manual labor as human labor continues to get cheaper than machines.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’ll take your shittiest MS Paint meme over your finest AI design.

    I want the human element! I’m not relating to a machine. I want something made by another ghost in a meat suit.

  • benni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Libre office draw is also underrated for memes. You can mark sections inside the file and export them to png.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    GIMP is not low effort. If you can ‘quickly assemble’ memes, it’s because of previous effort. (I’m studying to be someone who can quickly assemble memes in GIMP)

    That program has a unique UI philosophy. Does it resemble Photoshop? I’ve never used that.

    • Novaling@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Never used Photoshop either but from the way everyone and their mother compares it to GIMP when complaining about the UI, I think it’s safe to say GIMP sucks in that regard.

      I’m not gonna lie, the few times I’ve used GIMP to crop a picture, I felt lost as hell.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        GIMP feels like it’s still in the stage of being extremely powerful but awkward as heck to wield, like Blender used to be. Blender used to have a pretty unintuitive interface before getting a massive overhaul a few years back. GIMP could use a similar facelift IMO.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Drag never got truly proficient with Photoshop. Drag took a class on Photoshop in high school and did well, but then forgot everything. The workflows never became natural.

          Drag has made dozens of memes in GIMP and really understands the design philosophy. It feels simple and intuitive. Drag wouldn’t want them to change everything and make it like Photoshop. Then drag would have to learn it all over again. No thanks.

          Different apps should just be different apps. The goal isn’t to get every system to have the same UI. There should be room for creativity and thinking differently in the design space.

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Gimp 3.0 is finally actually something you could use to make something quickly

      It still makes some baffling decisions (seriously I fucking hate that deselect is CTRL+SHIFT+D and not CTRL+D. I get why, shift is the “opposite” modifier, but GIMP is the only software I use that does this) and isn’t perfect, but for meme making and general Internet use it’s probably at long-last ready

  • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I asked ChatGPT to make a cutting edge, unique, creative, evolutionary meme that appeals to Gen Z and…this is what it did.

    Ew.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The capybara with airpods, lol. Are capybaras particularly popular with Gen Z?

      It’s interesting to me to see the airpods aren’t even in its ears, which I take as the LLM not recognizing that the capybara’s ears are ears. Or maybe it doesn’t recognize that airpods belong in ears, and just sees that it generally goes on the side of the head where ears usually are. It really is fascinating technology, shame it’s used in the way it is.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        LLM? I would’ve thought they’d use an image generation model for this rather than a language model. But yeah, it just does approximations without a lot of reasoning.

      • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        i wouldn’t consider it an inherently LLM issue, given how many animal cartoons we have who also wear headphones where human ears would be.

        it’s such a human error

  • Petersson@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Chatbots: Fuck you

    Image AI: Fuck you

    Partially use of AI in complex film productions etc: Fine

    Plant recognition: You’re cool

    Surveillance AI: Fuck you

    Scientific use of machine learning: Great!

    Commercial AI in general: And fuck you, I’m out!

    • Deme@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Data analysis and forecasting chaotic systems too complex for brute force numerical hijinks are great applications for neural networks. One dude I saw was doing his PhD on nowcasting (weather forecasts of the very short term (10 to 90 min. range) showers and thunderstorms with neural networks. Interesting stuff.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The average anti-ai zealot only know about Diffusion and Large Language models because they once used ChatGPT for 15 minutes, read some memes and are now an expert on how AI is ruining society.

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          To be fair, the sloppier side of AI has a much more direct effect on society than niche scientific and engineering applications, but I get what you’re after.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh yeah, most people see AI as ‘the thing that has made search completely unusable’ and not ‘The thing that has solved protein folding’.

            It’s like the Internet is full of cavemen who are screaming and throwing rocks at a fire while, elsewhere, others are building jet turbines and combustion engines.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Plus we’ve had that shit in research since I was in grad school over a decade ago. People acting like machine learning is new. Smh

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Chatbots: Fuck you

      Really? Honestly it’s the most innocent use if you’re not the kind of person to get hooked on them

      Image AI: Fuck you

      I get why people have this harsh stance, but without my locally-hosted AI doing concept work for me then my avatar as you see it here wouldn’t exist nor would an artist be considerably more wealthy than they were before I commissioned them. I get that I’m in the minority by a wide margin, but people like me exist in decent amounts too

      Commercial AI in general: And fuck you, I’m out!

      Yeah, commercial AI is the problem. I cannot begin to understand being upset at someone running it locally and not for profit though, which happens a lot

      ETA: Case in point - the dipshits who downvoted me for this. Good job not using y’all’s brains

      • I agree, locally hosted AI tools for image or text generation don’t use lots of power, only do what a user wants and not what a corp wants, and are a valid hobby or working tool. It’s sad that so many people are blinded by their hate towards corporate AI and don’t differentiate.

        I am a terrible artist, but if i need a quick picture for a presentation or just a new desktop background, i sure as shit would never commission something but would just go without if there’s nothing with a CC license that fits. Today i have the possibility to get exactly what i want, and not one byte gets transferred outside of my home network, There is no lost sale for any artists, and i still have something that is aesthetically pleasing.

        Same with chatbots - i mainly use them as a quick reference for commands when i don’t want to read 15 screens worth of man pages or when i am again stuck creating a RegEx.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Chatbots, as they currently exist, are extremely concerning, especially in regards to their use by children and teenagers. Chatbots have neither ethics nor rational thought, and as such they can’t tell right from wrong, nor true from false. Meanwhile, kids and teens are still learning what’s reality and what isn’t, meaning that a realistic, ever-confident bot without any ethical or logical understanding can easily lead them astray. There’s already been one kid who killed himself because a realistic chatbot goaded him on.

        That’s already happening today, without any human oversight or guidance over the specific content on LLMs. But that may not be the case forever - consider that if AI chatbots are already that influential, how long until companies find a way to get their own products promoted by them?

        Advertisers study the fine art of manipulation, they know the power of a personal story or recommendation from a friend. Until now, if they wanted that, they’ve had to either create a product/experience that generates word-of-mouth praise, or else incentivize people to generate such praise (ie “influencers.”) But now, there’s this technology that is able to fake being someone’s friend, that plenty of people will trust wholeheartedly. That’s a system that’s ripe for corruption. Add in that Republicans are trying to ban the regulation of AI and it becomes clear - this technology will be abused. I’d even go so far as to say that it was intended to be used to manipulate people all along.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I use AI solely for writing little scripts to automate the boring stuff with python. Sometimes with a bash script, but I’m far less comfortable with those.