They say they’re a viable alternative to starlink and ready to start - not sure how much true is that

I read a musk fan saying “but their terminals aren’t made in a NATO country” - isn’t the same for starlink?

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I haven’t checked all of them, but I looked up the first three receivers listed by Eutelsat Oneweb for “land mobility” usage. One was made in the US and UK, one was South Korean, and the one intended for military usage is Spanish. I guess South Korea is not NATO, but that’s about the NATO-est non-NATO country there is

  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Americans are definitely going to cut off StarLink, we don’t have any option even if OneWeb isn’t fully ready.

    • scratchee@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah, it’ll definitely be worse using a less complete constellation, but at least you can probably trust them to not fuck around and ruin military operations out of malicious political flailing, or whatever it is that Musk is doing constantly, so that’ll be a nice change of pace.

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        or that you won’t get baited&switched with the “we will give thousands of completely free* terminals”

        *=each “free” terminal is subject to a $500/month usage fee