• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’m curious how this will go down in Australia. Seems like a pretty solid slam dunk refund, oh the product doesn’t work as advertised anymore?

    Cool, I’ve had this for 5 years and now I’d also like a full refund under Australian Consumer Law.

    Motherfuckers.

    (I don’t actually own a printer)

    • JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I imagine they have some stupid note or sticker somewhere saying “to avoid damaging your printer only use genuine Brother replacement cartridges”.
      Then all they have to say is “we patched a bug where unverified 3rd party ink cartriges could erroneously be used and cause malfunction or damage to the product.”

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I found this help article where they say “Although not all non-genuine supplies may cause quality issues”.

        They said they recommend using theirs, but up until this they didn’t say you couldn’t.

        https://support.brother.com/g/b/sp/faqend.aspx?c=us_ot&lang=en&prod=dcpl2647dw_us&faqid=faq00000184_002

        Plus, it’s been universally understood that you have been able to use third-party cartridges. I really think if you’re persistent enough, you’d get a refund in Australia. Because else (in Victoria at least) you could take them to VCAT for like $70, which will cost them wayyy more in lawyer expenses than the price of a refund.

        This is not legal advice, but I reckon a refund under Australian Consumer Law is extremely doable if they go down this path (for existing printers).