• alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Federal taxes don’t actually work that way. The federal government prints its own money. All taxes effectively go into a giant shredder and are unrelated to spending.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t even know where to begin correcting such an insane statement. Why do you think k taxes are collected if it just gets shredded? Sadistic pleasure?

      • didnt1able@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        He makes a good point, it’s just to balance the inflation. Take the tax money to offset the federal reserve printing swathes of money to fund government endeavors.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a real theory. From what I understand though the shredder is a thought experiment, not meant to be taken seriously. They do acknowledge that you have to receive money to spend money. they just think of it like a balancing act instead of a 1 to 1 relationship.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          You don’t need to receive money to spend money if you print money. The purpose of taxation is to reduce the monetary supply.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            In one specific economic theory.

            I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m pointing out that it’s a whole debate.