Edit: I meant to leave this empty to start, but to clarify now that there’s other discussion:

“Access to minerals” doesn’t necessarily mean “discounted” or “mineral rights”. It could be a deal consisting of:

  1. Military aid goes to EU defence industry supplies
  2. In exchange, EU gets first dibs at market rate contracts (with some tax-exempt on on the EU side for imports to make it more appealing to take advantage of on both sides) for metals/mineral extraction.

This could help spur Ukraine’s post-war economy, integration with EU markets, and benefit the EU defence industry. It would also demonstrate what a real and fair deal looks like.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If done how OP proposes, this isn’t really taking advantage of Ukraine at all.

      It’s mostly just forming a strategic partnership and making sure EU companies are financially invested in Ukraine which will result in political pressure for lasting peace and EU aid.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If done how OP proposes, this isn’t really taking advantage of Ukraine at all.

        Yeah, he add additional info after my comment (was just the title before).

      • CBYX@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My focus is also on delegitimizing bullshit deal proposals with something fair :)