Blue Ghost, a NASA-funded lunar lander built and operated by the private U.S. company Firefly Aerospace, has successfully touched down on the moon.

After 45 days in space—and a pulse-pounding semi-autonomous hour-long descent to its landing site—at 3:34 A.M. EST the boxy, car-sized spacecraft’s four footpad-tipped legs crunched into the surface of Mare Crisium, a vast and ancient impact basin filled with frozen lava on the moon’s northeastern near side. This marks the second time the U.S. has soft-landed on the moon since the crewed Apollo 17 mission of 1972

  • stickly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fuck that, keep all private enterprise out of space. Polluting our orbit with useless satellites was bad enough.

    Do we need to push our unsustainable growth onto lifeless celestial bodies? Why burn our limited resources on astronaut-cosplay rollercoasters for billionaires? Can’t they just go die in a submarine like normal people?

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Not inherently.

        There’s just too much going on in it and it’s not very coherent.

        I think what they wanted to say was:

        1. Fuck excessive human greed.
        2. We should focus on fixing problems here on earth, first, before we truly go to space.
        3. Celebrating private enterprises going and claiming space and progressing their investments will most likely exacerbate the existing sociopolitical and economic issues.
        4. Eat the rich
  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Article is paywalled.

    But that’s awesome! It’s nice to see more (successful) lunar landings, and it’s cool that more private companies are giving it a shot.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    I really don’t get the hardon for getting humans in space I think we should figure out how much we can max out robots and such doing things and when we simply cannot figure out how to do something without a human then maybe send up bodies.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I realize a lot of online comments are either support or complaint about an article but Im a bit wierd in that sometimes I just comment around the subject. What got me thinking about it is it did not seem to have a rover or anything so was a bit disapointed (unless the article simply did not mention it or felt measurements implied that). So my comment is just on the nasa back to the moon and musks american flags on mars stuff. articles like this just get me thinking about the subject.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          This line of landers is a delivery system. This mission was to prove they can do it successfully. It carried ten scientific experiment payloads, as noted in the article.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Asteroid capture doesn’t seem out of the realm of near future possibility. Then we could directly mine and refine materials in space with robots, sparing the earth more climate altering pollution and saving humans from slave work in unregulated mines.