Summary

Trump has rejected the EU’s “zero-for-zero” tariff offer on cars and industrial goods, demanding instead that the bloc commit to purchasing $350 billion of American energy to offset the trade deficit.

Following his implementation of 20% tariffs on EU goods last week, which triggered significant market downturns, Trump indicated openness to negotiations while emphasizing his “America First” stance.

He also criticized EU product standards as “non-monetary barriers” designed to block American exports.

  • Aliktren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Horse shit to be frank. Aws and google cloud are huge and companies move slowly, if the top 100 euro companies decided to all get off these platforms now it would take months and months of unplanned intense effort and money

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      it would take months and months of unplanned intense effort and money

      You know how much it costs EU taxpayers and customers to pay for the usage and licensing of US tech? Its absolutely absurd and most companies here are fed up with it. They will take any good alternative if its presented to them in a trustworthy manner.

      The move to cloud based stuff was mostly vibes and marketing based. On prem has been shown to be cheaper, more reliable, more secure, more flexible.

      • Comtief@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        If its so expensive, why doesn’t European companies make more competitive alternatives?

          • Comtief@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I’d imagine american cloud services are actually cheaper (because they are so scaled up or whatever), that’s why everyone uses them. So I don’t know where the argument comes from that they are expensive.

            • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              These companies dont treat commercial customers any better than normal users. They undergo the same process of:

              lower prices to get customers > buy up competition > lobby politcians to protect their grift > raise prices and lower service quality as much as possible without losing the customer

              • Comtief@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                but has it happened yet? if yes, then why are we still using american stuff? i just don’t buy it.

                here is an example: uber was very popular in europe, but they started twisting the knife with prices. alternatives popped up, uber is not so popular anymore.

                • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You cant run Uber in the EU in the same way they do in the US, because we have actual labor laws. The laws for the digital tech sector have simply not caught up with the pace of the industry, thats why they are so easily exploitable.

                  • Comtief@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    Now you’re just arguing with an example I brought up on the fly, not my actual point. Well, whatever…

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They do, but the U.S. companies have vendor lock-in and a choke hold on the market.

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          The world is as big as your eyes can see huh? The only reality that can possible exist is the current one? There are no people other than yourself? How small minded can a person be?

          • Aliktren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            No i am saying there will be companies that go quickly and the large mass that cannot pivot that quickly, we work and talk to other big retailers, cloud is everywhere.

    • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not no sure. 90%+ of these services are commodities and nobody gives a damn who the provider is from a technical perspective. There’s no physical component, so it’s literally a matter of signing a contract, spinning up a server/service, move the data and point everything to the new service.

      And yeah, there are technical issues that come up, and nothing is ever that easy. But think about how fast many, many companies were able to sort that kind stuff out when the had to when COVID hit.

      And that’s the thing. Cloud service disruption can be an existential crisis, so why would you leave it in the hands of a hostile foreign power?

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        There are physical data centres that are not trivial to build and run. As I understand it, these tend to be run by the big US tech companies. So if you switch to EU service companies that are still using AWS, Google Cloud or Azure backends, you haven’t really switched away from US tech companies.

    • AugustWest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Some of the companies I have been working with were already beginning to leave. The realization that cloud pricing will only go up AND being locked into it made them very wary. Some of the planning was already underway, this may only accelerate those plans.

      • Aliktren@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Great for them, there will be a lot that only just got through their first painful migrations

        • AugustWest@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I agree. However, I also have seen that the pain they went through to get to the cloud helped them consolidate and define what they were managing. So the backing out is turning out to be a bit easier than getting in.

          • Aliktren@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Right but thats big, probably multitear programmes of work, would be for us, agree we cut some fat along the way