• Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    First off, Signal hasn’t said anything, this is an accusation made at a conference in Kyiv. So - who knows, they’re behind, they don’t have billions to support an army, who knows.

    IF they have chosen to not help Ukraine where at all possible, that would be bad.

    All of that said, if I was running a modern army using an encrypted chat app, I’d fucking have all that shit in-house, wtf. It’s 2025. Ukraine already has a bunch of l337 h4X0rs. I’m sure they could slap something together in days and have it in the field in weeks.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 hours ago

    What exactly is the cooperation that Signal was doing beforehand? Signal claims to collect very little data so I’m not sure how exactly they help?

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Russia was caught running a bunch of side channel and phishing attacks using malicious QR codes. Presumably signal could help track these patterns in terms of time and place, to help isolate where espionage activity was occuring.

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Did it ever respond to those “requests”? What would Signal have anyway other than phone number to login association.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          7 hours ago

          National security laws supercede the courts… If they called info on national security grounds, it would not be disclosed in court papers.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If they secretly kept that info and didn’t release it, I guess that could be true. But do we have a reason to believe they’re keeping that info?

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              a FISA court order can force them to collect what they can which would includr time stamps and who you are contacting.

              I don’t think signal logs it by default though, but jack shit they can do about national security laws since they are incorporated under US law.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    47
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Give it time. Before long you’ll see articles about how we need to ban encryption to help Ukraine fight Russia & Democrats will support it cause that is how clueless many of them are.

  • postall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ok, they had choice to use Jami, app independent of anyone, but they chose centralization…

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The article is about Signal providing info on what the Russians are doing on the app and not Ukraine using it themselves

    • aleq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Did they really? I assume they would do more research than me when choosing tech, but my initial reaction is “the fuck is a Jami?”. Is this a big app in recent years?

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s a messenger backed by the GNU foundation. The last time I tried it it didn’t reliably deliver messages on Android.

      • postall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        And you’re proud of that? Well, I’m glad someone else has found out about serverless, independent messenger.

        • aleq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Not sure how you read pride into this at all, the implication is that if they don’t know about it it’s not a choice, while at the same time acknowledging that perhaps I’m just out of the loop.

        • mohab@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Jami sucks. I will continue to have it installed and hope one day it evolves into a reliable instant messenger, but, currently, it’s extremely unreliable. Not for times of war.

          • postall@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yup, he had some problems that are almost gone now. It’s an obvious consequence of being completely serverless. But it provides independence. I transferred all my communication there, and frankly I’m surprised that everything works for many people I know. Signal doesn’t. But Telegram and WhatsApp still does. For how long…

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The article explains everything. The gist is Russians are targeting Ukrainians with phishing attacks via Signal. There also is the suggestion they’re exploiting the linked devices functionality, though I’m not sure how.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Appreciate this, I don’t click links lol

            Apparently if they can get you to scan some bogus qr code they can get you add their device to your account.

            Why signal not cooperating tho? Following us government?

            • qaz@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              6 hours ago

              …I don’t click links…

              I strongly suggest doing so if you want to understand what the article is about

            • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Because they can’t without backdooring the software? Just like they also refuse to co-operate with Swedish government and threatened to leave the market should Sweden try to force them.

              You know Russian spies can also use TOR onion routing and so on.

              As for phishing there is nothing Signal can do about someone scanning a signal contact sharing QR and adding it to their contracts list beyond informative “hey are you really sure, really really sure you want to add this contact”. If user trusts someone they shouldn’t, no amount of app policy protections help. Or maybe they manage to shish them to scan and approve “share account to another device”. Again nothing Signal can do about that.

            • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Not sure. Might be political tension. Might be that phishing attacks are typically user error, and Signal feels like at a certain point it’s not their responsibility. Hard to say beyond conjecture, and I didn’t see a clear reason given in the article.