The latest Edge Canary version started disabling Manifest V2-based extensions with the following message: “This extension is no longer supported. Microsoft Edge recommends that you remove it.” Although the browser turns off old extensions without asking, you can still make them work by clicking “Manage extension” and toggling it back (you will have to acknowledge another prompt).

At this point, it is not entirely clear what is going on. Google started phasing out Manifest V2 extensions in June 2024, and it has a clear roadmap for the process. Microsoft’s documentation, however, still says “TBD,” so the exact dates are not known yet. This leads to some speculating about the situation being one of “unexpected changes” coming from Chromium. Either way, sooner or later, Microsoft will ditch MV2-based extensions, so get ready as we wait for Microsoft to shine some light on its plans.

Another thing worth noting is that the change does not appear to be affecting Edge’s stable release or Beta/Dev Channels. For now, only Canary versions disable uBlock Origin and other MV2 extensions, leaving users a way to toggle them back on. Also, the uBlock Origin is still available in the Edge Add-ons store

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We need a truly FOSS browser that developed and maintained by the community. Librewolf isn’t it unless it fully forks away from Mozilla. We need a new engine and we just don’t have one yet.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            BSD licensed

            Ew. It ought to be AGPLv3.

            (I almost just said “copyleft,” but as Chromium proves, even LGPL is insufficient protection from corporate usurpation.)

        • cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I agree. I’d even be willing to regularly donate to a foundation that would have this aim as their goal and have their acts matching their promises.

          Although, not necessarily a new engine. Going from scratch is a good way to remake a lot of mistakes, while reusing old code is a good way to keep old debt. That’s not a decision I would like to have to take.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I was on Netscape in the 90s, I got on Firefox when it was still Phoenix/Firebird, and I haven’t left once. You’ve been a good friend.

    (Though I do like Palemoon a lot since I love the pre Quantum and pre WebExtensions days).

        • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Zen was amazing when they first came to light, but they keep changing how workflows work, and it destroyed the workflow I had.

          For example, I am a browser minimalist. I don’t need workspaces, and I don’t have thousands of tabs open, because that’s insane to me, personally. I now have to see the ugly Default Workspace at the top of my tab bar every time I go to open or switch tabs. This was an option before, so it was perfectly fine. They’ve taken that option away, which is very much not okay. Options are good. They also messed around with the New Tab icon, making it to where I couldn’t move it to the bottom where I prefer it to be, instead putting it at the top, which is extra movement needed to get to the top… They later added that back in, but again, why the fuck are you just willy nilly taking options away from people? It should just be an OPTION.

          Anyway, I’ve had so many headaches with their approach to changing workflows that I don’t even recommend it to anyone any longer. I’m sure I’m just the crazy person who wants some of the offerings, while not being FORCED to use some of the others. :)

          • warm@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, I hate how projects become allergic to options. If you want to push your own agenda with new defaults, okay fine, but never ever remove options, let people keep it how they liked it.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Infinite options is bad design for a number of reasons. One is that when everyone’s experience is unique, troubleshooting is impossible. Two is that when you add an option, you have to support that option forever.

              Options are expensive, at least if you want to keep your software working for a long period of time.

              • warm@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Then adding too many options is the problem, not having options in the first place.

            • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I saw in their notes for the previous updates about the workspaces, which essentially said “workspaces are a major part of Zen, so you are no longer allowed to NOT use them”. When it was clearly a viable option before. So much for being customizable!

            • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I have a feeling you might be one of those that turned their automatic updates off after an issue where they really, really fucked the UI up on Macs, or something like that. Or you might be a person who doesn’t like the auto updates anywhere.

              I turned mine off for awhile, but don’t want to catch anything when a new FF release rolls out, so I turned them back on, especially since I rarely use the browser anymore due to said changes with no user options.

              I’m on the latest version on Windows, Linux, and Mac. The option is gone, I’m afraid.

                • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  While I really appreciate you for helping, the fact that these were part of the core application, then taken away by the developers so that we rely on third parties to bring back, is my biggest gripe with the browser. The options were there, and they took them out. I would rather just go back to Firefox than deal with an always changing UI, and removal of options. :/

        • Wise@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Hopefully mainline Firefox can take some design notes from Zen

    • Waldschrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Well, Firefox tries really hard to go to shit as well with their new Privacy Policy and their first ever Terms of Service.

      • XiberKernel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 minutes ago

        Genuine question - isn’t their terms basically “if you use these third party services you’re subject to their terms, and also were going to collect some data to see if people actually use this feature or if it’s a waste of time?”

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        For anybody unaware, their new privacy notice essentially states that if you opt in to using a third party LLM within Firefox, the LLM provider will get the info that you give to the LLM.

    • intelisense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I use Firefox for most things, but Google Meet maxes out all my CPUs if I use Firefox. Any kind of screen sharing kills it. Suggestions on how I can get video encoding working greatly appreciated… Intel Xe graphics.

  • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    Why would anyone use anything but Brave anyway? Brave will still support manifest v2 shit.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 seconds ago

      Brave will support it until it becomes inconvenient or difficult to do so as the Chromium base keeps moving everywhere onwards. The more time goes on, the more work it’ll be for Brave to maintain this forked functionality.

      My guess is at some point Brave will discontinue V2 and say “just use the Brave inbuilt adblocker”.

      Regardless, Brave have their own skeletons in the closet… crypto, the Windows installer installing other Brave applications during browser install without consent (that one is straight up malware behaviour. Reminds me of the days of software installing Internet Explorer toolbars without consent), injecting their affiliate links when nobody asked, a CEO who donated money to homophobic causes more than once.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Ok maybe off topic, why does a web browser have to be one of the most complicated software artifacts on earth? So expensive to write and maintain that only a few orgs with huge developer resources can do it?

    What would it look like to start from scratch with a massively simplified standard for specifying UIs, based on all we’ve learned since html/css was invented? A standard that a few developers could implement in a few weeks using off the shelf libraries. Rather than reimplement every bizarre historical detail in html/css, have a new UI layout system that’s simple and consistent, and perhaps more powerful.

    • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If you don’t want to be compatible with what millions of websites are written in (because that’s the complicated part), you now have to convince all of them to invest lots of money to migrate to your new web standard… Good luck…

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        You don’t have to replace the html web. If a new system was sufficiently fun to create with, people might use it for all kinds of cool new projects. Kind of like Flash used to be. You’d go there for a specific thing you heard about.

        A new web free of cruft might turn out to be cheaper to develop for, and that might appeal to the corporate types. Maybe useful for intranet type apps where the browser is specified anyway and you have a captive audience.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Basically browsers are big because they are operating systems for web hosted applications with huge attack surfaces and lots of legacy compatibility requirements amassed over 3 decades.

      A rewrite isn’t the answer. Putting limits on browser functionality is. JavaScript was the turning point IMHO.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What would it look like to start from scratch with a massively simplified standard for specifying UIs, based on all we’ve learned since html/css was invented?

      Probably a lot better. The difficult, and expensive, part is getting everyone to migrate over to this new standard, not because it’d be unfeasible but because companies don’t want to spend any time or money on things that they don’t think will make them profit.

      What we’d need is, for example, the EU realizing that Google’s attempted monopoly on the internet is dangerous and requiring a certain standard for private consumer-facing websites to get the ball rolling.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’d direct people to Firefox, but Mozilla is doing some weird shit right now and I just can’t. And the forks are always with some weird limitations or issues. Why does it all have to be shit these days?

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I had a feeling this would happen. I have to use Google services for a lot of things at work and Edge works fine with them. Firefox usually does okay, but not always. And now Firefox is requiring you to hand over your data to them.

    Can any Chromium-based browser refuse to turn on V3 or is it too baked-in without forking the entire project?

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      And now Firefox is requiring you to hand over your data to them.

      If you’re talking about the recent news, that’s not what the updated privacy notice says.

      Mozilla will be adding opt in LLM functionality to Firefox. It can use third party LLM providers. The privacy has been updated to say “btw, any info you give to this LLM will be processed by the LLM by a third party.” I.e. the LLM provider has the data once you send it to them.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And now Firefox is requiring you to hand over your data to them.

      If you’re talking about the most recent news about the Terms of Service, that is a gross misreading of what they said.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      90% of people and corporations are either using Edge or Chrome and since there’s essentially no difference between the two they are equally bad. We’re back to a browser mono-culture, just like in the bad old days of Internet Explorer.

      • Naich@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that’s not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery. I haven’t seen a “best viewed in Chrome” for a decade or two.

        Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s not that bad yet. FF works on pretty much any site that’s not demonstrating some sort of bleeding edge fuckery.

          Yet. I lived through the first browser war (Netscape Navigator vs Internet Explorer) and I’d estimate we’re right about the year 2000 ish. At that time both browsers were still active and reasonably well supported but it was clear that IE was going to win and somewhere in the IE6 / IE7 (2004 / 2006) time frame is when the real fuckery started. Since Edge started using Chromium in 2018(ish) we’re basically following the same schedule from two decades ago.

          Hopefully this sort of enshittification will drive more people to use other browsers.

          Sadly this is the same thing we said back then too and we (IT & the tech community) pushed hard to get people to leave IE and adopt Chrome.

          • Link@rentadrunk.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Don’t forget Safari. On iOS it is the only usable browser currently with everything else just being a reskin of Safari. There are a lot of iOS users.

            That is set to change but only in the European Union.

      • espentan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Uuuuh… being a web dev in those days… You essentially first built support for proper browsers, then it was time to make things look and work as they should (or close to it) in IE.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yup. Software developer here for a small company. We use a Windows. Chrome for testing applications and edge is just there. We are all in on Microsoft, server is C# .Net, running on azure with teams and outlook and office.

        I do use Firefox though but I’m the only one out of 7.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m also a software developer and I’ve never touched any of that professionally. There’s a lot more diversity of ecosystems out there, bud.

          • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I know there are but my employer is amazing and the work life balance is great. Don’t care enough to try and change our tech stack, but I hold no ill will towards anyone who does care enough.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Did you know Wayne Gretzky and his brother hole the record for highest scoring brother duo in the NHL?

        That comment reads the same way.

    • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      On the rare occasion I want to stream movies while on my PC at 1080p, because most online movie services will only stream 1080p to Edge. Some times Chrome will be allowed to stream 1080p but it’s pretty hit or miss in my experience. On another note, basically no streaming services will stream movies to you in 4k on a PC, I’ve also found most streaming apps on my phone won’t give me 4k either, you can only really get 4k streaming to a smart TV… it’s pretty ridiculous.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Why let the streaming services tell you what you can or can’t watch videos on when you can just pirate everything?

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      My workplace configures edge and chrome by default, were very office365 integrated and support chrome for some dates specific thing.

      Now i am privileged with local admin powers so i have firefox. Still the integrations with edge run deep so i still have to use it lots of times. There are plans for copilot which is one of the dummest llm bots (opinion) but is again catered to edge.

      I will however never use chrome (anymore). Google was the second tech giant i dropped after facebook. They cannot redeem themselves for destroying the web (opinion). I rarely use search engines anymore but i rather use bing and bing sucks. (duckduck is also based on bing)

      Sorry for the rant, but that was relieving. Arch btw.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Corps. All of the bells and whistles it has ties into the corps tenant which includes isolation of things like sync’d profiles, seamless sso, favorites, extensions, etc

      Since it’s all under the tenant, all of that data is subject to the same privacy and policies the corp and MS agreed to, which makes it easy to work with other companies that have their own client policy requirements.

      MS also makes it easy to control and harden all of their products including Edge using policy controls from a single UI.

      You can’t do any of this with Firefox without extra effort.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah the level of control Active Directory can have over Edge is unparalleled. The entire industry would move to a more secure browser and can be centrally managed with Active Directory if something existed.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Edge wasn’t that bad honestly, I prefer it over chrome and use it when I need to test a site on that engine.

        • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          48 minutes ago

          Was super easy but my setup is pretty minimal.

          Export bookmarks from Firefox, install favourite addons in the Floorp extension menu and lastly import bookmarks.

          Most of the settings will be familiar and some features will be new like the workspaces and sidebar.

          Hope your transfer goes smoothly!

    • Kiuyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Did they fix the issue of their license partially closed? Or is it still the same

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Microsoft Edge is literally Google Chrome button replaced with Microsoft Features/Spyware