As per title really. I’m looking for a new small music player that will play MP3 and FLAC files. Preferably that takes a large SD card, otherwise has at least 128gb of storage. I want to be copying files directly on to it in a file browser and for them to play in the right order (I have a player that plays in the order the files were copied on to it, which is full on madness). I have no interest in iTunes and I run Linux as my computer OS.

Also needs to be less than £100.

And I really mean no wireless functionally at all, I don’t mean “includes Bluetooth but it can be turned off”.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ok, now you are just being ridiculous.

      This is clearly a troll thread.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Based on the comment saying

        Can’t have it in the office.

        I don’t think this is a troll. I think OP works in a high-security setting, or around extremely sensitive equipment. I’m leaning toward the latter because I wouldn’t expect an SD card to be allowed in a high-security setting.

        • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          An FM receiver is purely passive. I mean there might be places with rules against it, but why? It doesn’t influence or affect anything…

          • Zak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            FM receivers are capable of producing interference. Note their listing here.

            The weird thing about this post is that both of the obvious scenarios that would lead to the kind of restrictions OP’s workplace has don’t quite add up.

            • If radios are banned due to interference, random electronic devices like digital music players are also capable of producing interference. It’s surprising that any kind of personally owned electronic gadget is allowed.
            • If it’s a high-security environment, it’s surprising that any personally owned digital storage device is allowed.

            I wish OP would elaborate, not because I doubt them, but because the explanation is probably interesting.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          But receiving FM doesn’t matter. Tons of things can receive FM that don’t broadcast, like tooth fillings.

          • ch00f@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Tooth filings pick up AM, not FM. Assuming that’s even a real thing. All you need get AM is a diode which can be made to varying levels of performance with a number of common materials.

            FM radios generally use superheterodyne receivers which generate a radio frequency to be mixed with the incoming signal to pull out audio.

            This receiver does emit a small amount of RF as a result and it’s how the TV police in the UK would catch you for skirting a TV license.

    • m_f@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t know exactly what you’re avoiding wireless for, but it has no ability to transmit, only receive FM if that matters. You could fairly easily disconnect/break the antenna and permanently disable even that.