☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agoPride Versioninglemmy.mlimagemessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1imagePride Versioninglemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoeither have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoDate based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y). At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
either have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).
At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.