BomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 21 hours agoXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down116
arrow-up130arrow-down1imageXenia doesn't like Systemddiscuss.tchncs.deBomberMan9865@sh.itjust.works to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareVivendi@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up0·16 hours agos6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
minus-squarea Kendrick fan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoGuix_SD has its own init system, Gnu shepherd
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoAll of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.
s6, dinit, openrc, BSD rc, are all alternative init systems with their own method of doing thing
Guix_SD has its own init system, Gnu shepherd
All of them are worse in my experience. In a embedded context I use busybox init and if I need something more I used systemd. Systemd actually has a fairly small footprint. A few years ago I ran it on a system with 32mb of ram.